Bending Metal: Improving Sheet Metal Repair at Tobyhanna Army Depot through Lean Six Sigma

Main Article Content

James Enos
Abigail Burris
Liam Caulfield
Robert DeYoung
Sebastian Houng
Christopher Kubitz

Abstract

The Army's Lean Six Sigma methodology includes five phases: Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control (DMAIC); each of these phases includes interaction between the stakeholder and process team. This paper focuses on the application of Lean Six Sigma methodology at Tobyhanna Army Depot to help reduce overruns and repair cycle time within the sheet metal cost center. At the initiation of the project, the process incurred over 4,000 hours of overruns, a situation in which it takes longer to repair an asset than the standard hours allocated for the repair. Additionally, the average repair cycle time, amount of time required to repair an individual asset, exceeded customer expectations by almost four days. The paper describes recommended solutions to address both problems.

Article Details

How to Cite
Enos, J., Burris, A., Caulfield, L., DeYoung, R., Houng, S., & Kubitz, C. (2022). Bending Metal: Improving Sheet Metal Repair at Tobyhanna Army Depot through Lean Six Sigma. Industrial and Systems Engineering Review, 9(2), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.37266/ISER.2021v9i2.pp99-109
Section
Articles

References

Albliwi, S. (2014). Critical Failure Factors of Lean Six Sigma: A Systematic Literature Review. The International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 1012-1030. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/docview/1651699723/fulltextPDF/D5B41C5C5F8846E7PQ/1?accountid=15138
Antony, J., Snee, R., & Hoerl, R. (2017, June). Lean Six Sigma: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. Retrieved September 28, 2020, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319183983_Lean_Six_Sigma_Yesterday_Today_and_Tomorrow
Bertolaccini, L. (2015, April). The Statstical point of view of Qualty: the Lean Six Sigma methodology. Journal of Thoracis Disease, E66-E68. Retrieved from The Statistical Point of View of Quality: the Lean Six sigma methodology: https://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.usmalibrary.idm.oclc.org/pmc/articles/PMC4419289/
Brook, Q. (2020). Lean Six Sigma and Minitab: The Complete Toolbox Guide for Business Improvement. OPEX Resources Ltd.
de Mast, J., & Lokkerbol, J. (2012). An analysis of the Six Sigma DMAIC method from the perspective of problem solving. International Journal of Production Economics, 604-614.
George, M. L., Rowlands, D., Price, M., & Maxey, J. (2005). The Lean Six Sigma Pocket Toolbook. New York: the McGraw Hill Companies.
Muraliraj, J. (2018). Annotated Mehtodological Review of Lean Six Sigma. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 9, 2-49. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1994842243/fulltextPDF/4D2ADE7F933495CPQ/1?accountid=15138
Prashar, A. (2014). Adoption of Six Sigma DMAIC to reduce cost of poor quality. International Journal of Productivity and Project Management, 36(1), 103-126. Retrieved from https://www-proquest-com.usmalibrary.idm.oclc.org/docview/1469928199?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=15138
Shaffie, S. (2012). Lean Six Sigma. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.