Validation of an Ergonomics Assessment Method and Identification of Focus Areas through Development of a Novel Statistical Approach for Aggregated Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37266/ISER.2022v10i1.pp1-9Keywords:
logistic regression, ergonomic assessment, MSDs, data aggregation, intervention prioritization, tool validationAbstract
Musculoskeletal disorders continue to be a leading source of lost workdays across all industries. Common ergonomics assessment tools may include criteria extraneous to the stresses at specific companies or industries. Therefore, the creation of assessment tools, based on scientifically validated methods, with industry- or company-specific stresses may be of benefit. Privacy regulations (among other factors) may preclude the 1:1 allocation of stresses to health outcomes, prohibiting conventional epidemiological investigation and validation approaches, therefore requiring the use of aggregated data sources.
Based on data from the ergonomic assessment tool of interest (Safety and Ergonomics Risk Assessment - SERA) and aggregated data derived from internal insurance reports a statistical method is developed to investigate; 1) the validity of the tool, 2) a prioritization of intervention targets, and 3) the derivation of threshold values for monitoring. The method involves statistical tests used in epidemiological investigations and draws on the iterative modelling approach common to machine learning.
Using the described approach, significant results for known musculoskeletal issues, a prioritization of countermeasure and intervention targets, and threshold values for long-term monitoring were determined. The successful results indicate that the assessment tool investigated is valid. Consequently, the method is generalized such that practitioners can apply it, should they be faced with similarly structured data.
References
Arghami, S., Kalantari, R., Ahmadi Kionani, E., Zanjirani Farahani, A., & Kamrani, M. (2016). Assessing Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders in Women Workers in an Automobile Manufacturing Assembly Line. Journal of Human Environment and Health Promotion, 1(2), 75-79.
Bendel, R. B., & Afifi, A. A. (1977). Comparison of stopping rules in forward “stepwise” regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 72(357), 46-53.
DGUV. (2017, 16.01.2017). Die Berufskrankheit - was ist das? Retrieved from https://www.dguv.de/webcode.jsp?query=d1068085
DGUV. (2020, 07.07.2020). Meldung des Verdachts einer Berufskrankheit. Retrieved from https://www.dguv.de/webcode.jsp?query=d678324
Garg, A., Boda, S., Hegmann, K. T., Moore, J. S., Kapellusch, J. M., Bhoyar, P., Bloswick, D. (2013). The NIOSH Lifting Equation and Low-Back Pain, Part 1 Association With Low-Back Pain in the Backworks Prospective Cohort Study. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Ghasemkhani, M., Aten, S., & Azam, K. (2006). Musculoskeletal Symptoms Among Automobile Assembly Line Workers. Journal of Applied Sciences, 6(1), 35-39.
Hussain, T. (2004). Musculoskeletal symptoms among truck assembly workers. Occupational Medicine, 54(8), 506-512.
Klussmann, A., Liebers, F., Brandstädt, F., Schust, M., Serafin, P., Schäfer, A., Steinberg, U. (2017). Validation of newly developed and redesigned key indicator methods for assessment of different working conditions with physical workloads based on mixed-methods design: a study protocol. BMJ Open, 7(8), e015412. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015412
Liberty Mutual Workplace Safety Index. (2019). Retrieved from https://business.libertymutualgroup.com/business-insurance/Documents/Services/DS200.pdf
MEGAPHYS. (2019). MEGAPHYS - Mehrstufige Gefährdungsanalyse physischer Belastungen am Arbeitsplatz, Vol. 1 (F 2333). Retrieved from Dortmund: https://www.baua.de/DE/Angebote/Publikationen/Berichte/F2333.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=11
MEGAPHYS. (2020). MEGAPHYS - Mehrstufige Gefährdungsanalyse physischer Belastungen am Arbeitsplatz, Vol 2. (3/2020). Retrieved from Berlin: https://publikationen.dguv.de/widgets/pdf/download/article/3635
Mitchell, T. (1997). Machine Learning (1 ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Monaco, M. G. L., Uccello, R., Muoio, M., Greco, A., Spada, S., Coggiola, M., Miraglia, N. (2019). Work-related upper limb disorders and risk assessment among automobile manufacturing workers: A retrospective cohort analysis. Work-a Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation, 64, 755-761. doi:10.3233/WOR-193037
Piranveyseh, P., Motamedzade, M., Osatuke, K., Mohammadfam, I., Moghimbeigi, A., Soltanzadeh, A., & Mohammadi, H. (2016). Association between psychosocial, organizational and personal factors and prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders in office workers. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 22(2), 267-273. doi:10.1080/10803548.2015.1135568
Regulation (EU) 2016/679. (2016, 27.04.2016). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679&from=EN
Schmidt, C. O., & Kohlmann, T. (2008). When to use the odds ratio or the relative risk? International journal of public health, 53(3), 165.
Takala, E.-P., Pehkonen, I., Forsman, M., Hansson, G.-Å., Mathiassen, S. E., Neumann, W. P., Winkel, J. (2010). Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures at work. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 3-24.
Thompson, M. L., Myers, J., & Kriebel, D. (1998). Prevalence odds ratio or prevalence ratio in the analysis of cross sectional data: what is to be done? Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 55(4), 272-277.
Vos, T., Lim, S. S., Abbafati, C., Abbas, K. M., Abbasi, M., Abbasifard, M., Abdelalim, A. (2020). Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet, 396(10258), 1204-1222.
Werner, R. A., Franzblau, A., Gell, N., Ulin, S. S., & Armstrong, T. J. (2005). Predictors of upper extremity discomfort: a longitudinal study of industrial and clerical workers. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(1), 27-35.
Zhang, J., & Kai, F. Y. (1998). What's the relative risk?: A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA, 280(19), 1690-1691.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The copyediting stage is intended to improve the flow, clarity, grammar, wording, and formatting of the article. It represents the last chance for the author to make any substantial changes to the text because the next stage is restricted to typos and formatting corrections. The file to be copyedited is in Word or .rtf format and therefore can easily be edited as a word processing document. The set of instructions displayed here proposes two approaches to copyediting. One is based on Microsoft Word's Track Changes feature and requires that the copy editor, editor, and author have access to this program. A second system, which is software independent, has been borrowed, with permission, from the Harvard Educational Review. The journal editor is in a position to modify these instructions, so suggestions can be made to improve the process for this journal.
