Securing the Skies: A Value-Centric Approach to Modernizing the FAAD C2 System

Authors

  • Htut Khaung Oo
  • Matthew Dove
  • Joshua Lawrence
  • Robert Barrie
  • Sam Yoo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37266/ISER.2025v12i2.pp71-76

Keywords:

Air Defense, FAAD C2, Modern Warfare, Human-Centered Design, Interface Optimization, Counter-UAS

Abstract

In the evolving combat landscape, upgrading the U.S. Military’s Counter-Rocket, Artillery, Mortar (C-RAM), and Unmanned Aerial Systems (C-UAS) defenses is essential. Central to this upgrade is the Forward Area Air Defense Command and Control (FAAD C2) system, which is vital for air defense and protecting assets. This study aims to refine the FAAD C2 interface, enhance user experience, and minimize operator burden with human-centered design and the Systems Decision Process. Collaborative feedback from FAAD C2 operators, the Integrated Fires Rapid Capability Office (IFRCO), Northrop- Grumman, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Research and Engineering (MITRE) Corporation has shaped a strategy for interface improvement. Recommendations focus on applying semiotic principles and optimizing user experience to maintain FAAD C2’s efficacy in defending against current and emergent air threats, offering a focused approach to defense innovation.

References

Forward Area Air Defense Command and Control (FAAD C2) - USAASC. (n.d.). https://asc.army.mil/web/portfolio- item/anmpq-64-sentinel-2/. (Retrieved on 5 OCT 2023)

K. Reichmann. (n.d.). FAAD C2 Basis for DOD C-UAS Effort. https://www.defensedaily.com/faad-c2-basis-dod-c-suas- effort/unmanned-systems. (Retrieved on 9 NOV 2023)

Kascak, L., Rebola, C., Braunstein, R., & Sanford, J. (2013). Icon design for user interface of remote patient monitoring mobile devices.. (https://doi.org/10.1145/2507065.2507104)

Missiles, U. S. P. E. O., & Space. (n.d.). Interface Control Drawing (ICD) For the Command and Control System (C2S) And the Land-Based Phalanx Weapon System (LPWS) Of The Counter-Rocket Artillery Mortar (C-RAM) System. (United States Program Executive Office, 2021)

Nadin, M. (1988). Interface design and evaluation - semiotic implications. ResearchGate. (https://www.nadin.ws/wp- content/uploads/1988/03/Interface-Design-and-Evaluation.pdf)

Oulasvirta, A., & Abowd, G. (2016). User interface design in the 21st century. IEEE. (DOI: 10.1109/MC.2016.201)

Parnell, G., Driscoll, P., & Henderson, D. (2010). Decision making in systems engineering and management. Wiley. (DOI: 10.1002/9780470926963)

Sancadi, P. (n.d.). Value Management and Value Engineering for Any Project. https://projectmanager.com.au/value- management-and-value-engineering-for-any-project/. (Retrieved on 9 NOV 2023)

USAASC. (n.d.). Forward Area Air Defense Command and Control (FAAD C2) - USAASC. https://asc.army.mil/web/portfolio- item/anmpq-64-sentinel-2/. (Retrieved on 9 NOV 2023)

US DOD Selects New Counter- UAS Command and Control System. (n.d.). https://www.unmannedsystemstechnology.com/2020/07/u- s-dod-selects-new-counter-uas-command-control-system/. (Retrieved on 14 NOV 2023)

Yin, R., Li, W., Wang, W., & Xu, X. (2020). The Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology in UAV. (DOI: 10.1109/ISCTT51595.2020.00048)

Published

2025-04-09

How to Cite

Oo, H. K., Dove, M., Lawrence, J., Barrie, R., & Yoo, S. (2025). Securing the Skies: A Value-Centric Approach to Modernizing the FAAD C2 System. Industrial and Systems Engineering Review, 12(2), 71-76. https://doi.org/10.37266/ISER.2025v12i2.pp71-76