Next Generation Universal Ground Control System HMI Design

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Dec 18, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37266/ISER.2017v5i2.pp109-115

Main Article Content

Cory Anderson
Arianna Efaw
Edward Emery
John Mueller
James Schreiner

Abstract

The existing Human Machine Interface (HMI) for the Army’s Universal Ground Control Station (UGCS) represents a 1980s, windows-based technology which is neither intuitive nor scalable for operators. It creates high levels of cognitive load on the operators, and its closed architecture limits its adaptability for UAS missions as technologies evolve. This research presents a methodology for creating and evaluating next generation HMI designs while leveraging GNU Image Manipulation Program (GIMP) and TELLUS flight simulation software in the creation of five HMI prototype designs. A proof of concept approach in the evaluation of prototypes was performed with five UAS Aircraft Operators (15W MOS) and five USMA cadets; examination of the impact of age and experience on the perceived value of new HMI designs will influence recommendations on full experimental design. The value-focused approach to design presented in this paper and prototype designs provide a basis for full prototype development and experimental testing through PM UAS with the Intelligence and Maneuver Centers of Excellence. Results include a trade space and sensitivity analysis towards development of improved HMI designs. The methodology and high performing prototypes for HMI design will be integrated by the PM UAS CSI Project Office for further development and full experimental analysis.

Article Details

How to Cite
Anderson, C., Efaw, A., Emery, E., Mueller, J., & Schreiner, J. (2017). Next Generation Universal Ground Control System HMI Design. Industrial and Systems Engineering Review, 5(2), 109-115. https://doi.org/10.37266/ISER.2017v5i2.pp109-115
Issue
Vol. 5 No. 2 (2017): Industrial and Systems Engineering Review - Special Issue
Section
Articles

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

The copyediting stage is intended to improve the flow, clarity, grammar, wording, and formatting of the article. It represents the last chance for the author to make any substantial changes to the text because the next stage is restricted to typos and formatting corrections. The file to be copyedited is in Word or .rtf format and therefore can easily be edited as a word processing document. The set of instructions displayed here proposes two approaches to copyediting. One is based on Microsoft Word's Track Changes feature and requires that the copy editor, editor, and author have access to this program. A second system, which is software independent, has been borrowed, with permission, from the Harvard Educational Review. The journal editor is in a position to modify these instructions, so suggestions can be made to improve the process for this journal.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Affairs, A. S. (2013). System Usability Scale (SUS). US Department of Health & Human Services

Retrieved March 08, 2017, from https://www.usability.gov/how-to-and-tools/methods/system-usability-scale.html

Brooke, J. (1996). SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry, 189(194), 4-7.

Clemen, R. T., & Reilly, T. (2014). Making hard decisions with Decision Tools. Mason, OH: South-Western, Cengage

Learning.

GIMP. (2017). GIMP - GNU Image Manipulation Program. Retrieved from https://www.gimp.org/

Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in psychology, 52, 139-183.

Keeney, R. L., & Keeney, R. L. (2009). Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decision-making. Harvard University Press.

MCRI. (2017). Tellus Studios. Retrieved March 9, 2017, from http://www.mcri.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/TellusFoldoutOverview-ver9d-MCR-VER-1.pdf

NASA TLX Description. (2017). Brandon Thomas, USMA Instructor. [Interview by A. Efaw]. Interview

Parnell, G. S., Driscoll, P. J., & Henderson, D. L. (Eds.). (2011). Decision making in systems engineering and management (Vol. 81). John Wiley & Sons.

Regula, K. (2017, February 28). Personal Interview.

SCI HMI Overview [PPT]. (2016). Huntsville, AL: Program Management Unmanned Ariel Systems.

Zimmerman, S. & Boike, B. (2016, August 24). Telephone Interview.

Most read articles by the same author(s)