Main Article Content
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The copyediting stage is intended to improve the flow, clarity, grammar, wording, and formatting of the article. It represents the last chance for the author to make any substantial changes to the text because the next stage is restricted to typos and formatting corrections. The file to be copyedited is in Word or .rtf format and therefore can easily be edited as a word processing document. The set of instructions displayed here proposes two approaches to copyediting. One is based on Microsoft Word's Track Changes feature and requires that the copy editor, editor, and author have access to this program. A second system, which is software independent, has been borrowed, with permission, from the Harvard Educational Review. The journal editor is in a position to modify these instructions, so suggestions can be made to improve the process for this journal.
Allena-Ozolina, S., & Bazbauers, G. (2017). System Dynamics Model Of Research, Innovation and Education System For Efficient Use Of Bio-Resources. Retrieved June 02, 2020, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187661021733895X
Bartolomei, J., Hines, J. H., Diker, V. G., Langer, R. S., & Rowe, J. I. (2001). A System Dynamics Model of Government Engineering Support During the Development Phase of a Military Acquisition Program. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society.
Carter, Leah. (2021). Germany reports record €53 billion in NATO Defense Spending: Dw: 07.02.2021. Retrieved April 2021, from https://www.dw.com/en/germany-reports-record-53-billion-in-nato-defense-spending/.
Department of the Army. (2019). ADP 3-0: Operations. Washington, DC.
Fox, R. J. (1974). Arming America; how the U.S. buys weapons (1st ed.). Harvard School of Business.
Gostomelsky, V. (2019). Securing the Railroads from Cyber Attacks. Mass Transit. https://www.masstransitmag.com/safety-security/article/21116419/securing-the-railroads-from-cyberattacks.
Keller, P. (2013). American Enterprise Institute. Retrieved October 29, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep03157
Kleemann, Florian C., et al. (2020). Performance-Based Logistics In Germany: Case Studies From Defense Procurement.
Noredenman, M. (2017). Atlantic Council. Retrieved September 8, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep03489
Pike, J. (2019). Military Germany, Retrieved from: https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/europe/de.htm.
Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World (pp. 138-140). McGraw-Hill.
Suchman, M. C., & Eyre, D. P. (1992). Military Procurement as Rational Myth: Notes on the Social Construction of Weapons Proliferation. Sociological Forum, Mar., 1992, Vol 7.
Townsend, J. (2018). (Rep.). German Marshall Fund of the United States. Retrieved September 3, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep18858