Main Article Content
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The copyediting stage is intended to improve the flow, clarity, grammar, wording, and formatting of the article. It represents the last chance for the author to make any substantial changes to the text because the next stage is restricted to typos and formatting corrections. The file to be copyedited is in Word or .rtf format and therefore can easily be edited as a word processing document. The set of instructions displayed here proposes two approaches to copyediting. One is based on Microsoft Word's Track Changes feature and requires that the copy editor, editor, and author have access to this program. A second system, which is software independent, has been borrowed, with permission, from the Harvard Educational Review. The journal editor is in a position to modify these instructions, so suggestions can be made to improve the process for this journal.
Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(Jan), 993-1022.
Calarusso, M. J., Heckel, K. G., Lyle, D. S., & Skimmyhorn, W.L. (2016). Starting Strong: Talent-Based Branching of Newly Commissioned U.S. Army Officers. Strategic Studies Insitute and U.S. Army War College Press, 9(1), 1-62.
Department of the Army. (2015). Evaluation Reporting System. (Army Regulation 623-3). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Han, J., Kamber, M., & Pei, J. (2011). Data Mining Concepts and Techniques. Waltham, MA: Elsevier Inc.
Kite, D. P. (1998). The US Army Officer Evaluation Report: Why are We Writing to Someone Who Isn’t Reading? Air Command and Staff College Air University.
Lopez, T. C. (2013, March 29). New Army OER Means Fewer Boxes, More Accountability for Raters. Army News Service. Retrieved from: https://www.jble.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/257909/new-army-oer-means-fewer-boxes-more-accountability-for-raters/
Milkovich, G. T., & Boudreau, J.W. (1997). Human Resource Management. Boston, MA: Times Mirror Higher Education Group.
Morrisey, G. L. (1983). Performance Appraisals for Business & Industry. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Pfeffer J., & Sutton R. I. (2000). The knowing–doing gap: How smart companies turn knowledge into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Reese, T. R. (2002). Transforming the Officer Evaluation System: Using a 360 Degree Feedback Model. US Army War College, Pennsylvania.
Silge, J., & Robinson, D. (2019). Text Mining with R: A Tidy Approach. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.
Straffon, N. (1997). Promotion Boards. Army Reserve Magazine (Winter), 19.
Welch, J. F. (2001). Jack: Straight from the gut. New York: Warner Books.