Decentralized Supply Chain Network for Emerging Issues Using Mechanism Design and Agent-Based Modeling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37266/ISER.2022v10i1.pp28-33Keywords:
Supply Chain Design, Mechanism Design, Agent-based Modeling, Negotiations, PricingAbstract
Supply chain network is one of the problems businesses come across when they are dealing with finished goods. From making the goods to providing them to the consumer is part of the supply chain. Considering the market size and 21st-century population demands, it is crucial to have the optimal design of the supply chain network. This research aims to optimize the supply chain network design in external dealings and provides insight into the decision-making framework. The experiments are performed in NetLogo for agent-based modeling and mechanism design to portray how the supplier and customer relationship behaves in relation to price and negotiations. The study provides promising insight into more negotiations that will reduce the prices for customers and that customers at least should wait out in the first negotiation round. Lower the auction, supplier benefits. With a lower number of auctions, suppliers can manage to sell more frequently as well. This study provides empirical evidence for decisions that can benefit various parties depending on their expectations and reduce certain roadblocks. The importance of reducing such roadblocks is even greater in the times of COVID-19 affected supply chains which are having continual effects.
References
Aday, S., Safety, M. A.-F. Q. and, & 2020, undefined. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on the food supply chain. Academic.Oup.Com, 4(4), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/fqsafe/fyaa024
Bonabeau, E. (2002). Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(SUPPL. 3), 7280–7287. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082080899
Eskandarpour, M., Dejax, P., Miemczyk, J., & Péton, O. (2015). Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review. Omega (United Kingdom), 54, 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.01.006
Fan, M., Stallaert, J., & Whinston, A. B. (2003). Decentralized mechanism design for supply chain organizations using an auction market. Information Systems Research, 14(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.1.1.14763
Farahani, R. Z., Rezapour, S., Drezner, T., & Fallah, S. (2014). Competitive supply chain network design: An overview of classifications, models, solution techniques and applications. Omega (United Kingdom), 45, 92–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.08.006
Guan, D., Wang, D., Hallegatte, S., Davis, S. J., Huo, J., Li, S., Bai, Y., Lei, T., Xue, Q., Coffman, D. M., Cheng, D., Chen, P., Liang, X., Xu, B., Lu, X., Wang, S., Hubacek, K., & Gong, P. (2020). Global supply-chain effects of COVID-19 control measures. Nature Human Behaviour 2020 4:6, 4(6), 577–587. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0896-8
Hennet, J., & Arda, Y. (2008). Supply chain coordination ; A Game Theory approach.
Ishida, S. (2020). Perspectives on Supply Chain Management in a Pandemic and the Post-COVID-19 Era. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 48(3), 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2020.3016350
Maru, V. (2017). DESIGN OF MULTI-ECHELON SUPPLY CHAIN SYSTEMS TO OPTIMIZE COST AND SERVICE LEVELS (Issue July). Wichita State University.
Mellouli, S., Moulin, B., & Mineau, G. (2004). Laying down the foundations of an agent modelling methodology for Fault-Tolerant Multi-Agent Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3071, 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25946-6_18
Mollenkopf, D. A., Ozanne, L. K., & Stolze, H. J. (2021). A transformative supply chain response to COVID-19. Journal of Service Management, 32(2), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0143/FULL/HTML
Raj, A., Biswas, I., & Srivastava, S. K. (2018). Designing supply contracts for the sustainable supply chain using game theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 185(March), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.046
Sarmento, R. P. (2019). Inventory management - A case study with netlogo. ArXiv, 1–13.
Simchi-Levi, D., Wu, S. D., & Shen, Z.-J. M. (2008). Handbook of quantitative supply chain analysis: modeling in the business era. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 287.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The copyediting stage is intended to improve the flow, clarity, grammar, wording, and formatting of the article. It represents the last chance for the author to make any substantial changes to the text because the next stage is restricted to typos and formatting corrections. The file to be copyedited is in Word or .rtf format and therefore can easily be edited as a word processing document. The set of instructions displayed here proposes two approaches to copyediting. One is based on Microsoft Word's Track Changes feature and requires that the copy editor, editor, and author have access to this program. A second system, which is software independent, has been borrowed, with permission, from the Harvard Educational Review. The journal editor is in a position to modify these instructions, so suggestions can be made to improve the process for this journal.
