Predicting Undergraduate RPA Training (URT) Student Performance
Main Article Content
This project is in conjunction with the 558th Flying Training Squadron, the only Undergraduate Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA) Training (URT) squadron. The 558th is currently seeing a trainee failure rate of approximately 6%. The project team aims to predict student performance at URT using econometric regression strategies analyzing initial student data for selected trainees and identifying at-risk students early in the training timeline. The 558th seeks to enhance the performance of their trainees by identifying student trends indicative of success and failure prior to URT, enabling them to provide attention and resources to students in need. The team’s goal is to provide the 558th with information that will help them reduce the failure rate at URT without requiring additional funding. It was determined that GPA, PCSM, STEM, and Private Pilot’s License (PPL) status to be significant indicators of student success.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The copyediting stage is intended to improve the flow, clarity, grammar, wording, and formatting of the article. It represents the last chance for the author to make any substantial changes to the text because the next stage is restricted to typos and formatting corrections. The file to be copyedited is in Word or .rtf format and therefore can easily be edited as a word processing document. The set of instructions displayed here proposes two approaches to copyediting. One is based on Microsoft Word's Track Changes feature and requires that the copy editor, editor, and author have access to this program. A second system, which is software independent, has been borrowed, with permission, from the Harvard Educational Review. The journal editor is in a position to modify these instructions, so suggestions can be made to improve the process for this journal.
Carretta, T. R. (2013). Predictive validity of pilot selection instruments for remotely piloted aircraft training outcome. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 84(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.3357/asem.3441.2013
Carretta, T. R., Rose, M. R., & Barron, L. G. (2015). Predictive validity of UAS/RPA Sensor Operator Training Qualification measures. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 25(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508414.2015.981487
Jenkins, P. R., Caballero, W. N., & Hill, R. R. (2022). Predicting success in United States Air Force pilot training using Machine Learning Techniques. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 79, 101121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101121