The Mathematical Underpinnings of Defensive Counterair Operations in Great Power Competition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37266/ISER.2025v12i1.pp38-52Keywords:
Agile Combat Employment, Combat Air Patrols, Defensive Counterair, Missile Defense, Operations Planning, SimulationAbstract
In the context of the Great Power Competition, particularly with China's advancing long-range munitions capabilities, there is a critical need to adapt defensive counterair (DCA) operations planning. This paper addresses some challenges of the complex and time-consuming DCA planning processes, often resulting in suboptimal decisions. We explore the mathematical foundations of DCA operations and provide a closed-form solution that determines aircraft requirements based on desired operational distances and calculates required distances based on aircraft availability. This approach helps to enable the Agile Combat Employment (ACE) concept, offering increased flexibility in response to potential denial of access to predetermined locations. We demonstrate the applicability of our equations through a couple of notional examples and simulations, showing potential for more than 75%-time savings improvement for the calculations compared to current methods and improved mission effectiveness from improved aircraft allocation techniques. This potential increase in efficiency and effectiveness could improve the ability to adapt to changing strategic environments, supporting the ACE framework's goals of increased survivability and operational flexibility in contested spaces.
References
Ahuja, Ravindra K., Arvind Kumar, Krishna C. Jha, and James B. Orlin. 2007. “Exact and Heuristic Algorithms for the Weapon-Target Assignment Problem.” Operations Research 55 (6): 1136–1146. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/opre.1070.0440
Boardman, N. T., Brian J. Lunday, and M. Robbins. 2017. “Heterogeneous surface-to-air missile defense battery location: a game theoretic approach.” Heuristics 23:417–447. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10732-017-9350-0.pdf
Brown, Gerald, Matthew Carlyle, Douglas Diehl, Jeffrey Kline, and Kevin Wood. 2005. “A two-sided optimization for theater ballistic missile defense.” Operations research 53 (5): 745–763. https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/opre.1050.0231
Davis, Michael T, Matthew J Robbins, and Brian J Lunday. 2017. “Approximate dynamic programming for missile defense interceptor fire control.” European Journal of Operational Research 259 (3): 873–886. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221716309481
Foster, Harry. 2018. “The air domain and the challenges of modern air war- fare.” 2018 Index of US Military Strength, 59–73. https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2017-09/2018_IndexOfUSMilitaryStrength_FOSTER.pdf
Haywood, Adam B, Brian J Lunday, and Matthew J Robbins. 2022. “Intruder detection and interdiction modeling: A bilevel programming approach for ballistic missile defense asset location.” Omega 110:102640. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048322000482
Lloyd, Stuart P, and Hans S Witsenhausen. 1986. “Weapons allocation is NP-complete.” In 1986 summer computer simulation conference, 1054– 1058.
Moer, Zachary T., Christopher M. Chini, Peter P. Feng, and Steven J. Schuldt. 2023. "Contested Agile Combat Employment: A Site-Selection Methodology." Air & Space Operations Review 2 (1): 64-79. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/ASOR/Journals/Volume-1_Number-3/Chini_Contested_Agile_Combat_Employment.pdf
Sumption, J. 2017. The Hundred Years War, Volume 4: Cursed Kings. The Middle Ages Series v. 4. University of Pennsylvania Press, Incorporated. isbn: 9780812223880. https://books.google.com.sg/books?id=aDWXD gAAQBAJ.
Tsamtsaridis, Charalampos I. 2011. “Stochastic network interdiction for optimizing defensive counter air operations planning.” https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Stochastic-network-interdiction-for-optimizing-air-Tsamtsaridis/b1be0085d72dd5a7961ca9f71a1603c113f9bc7c
United States Air Force. 2023. “Air Force Doctrine Publication 3-01, Counterair Operations.” Maxwell AFB, AL: Lemay Center. https://www.doctrine.af.mil/Doctrine-Publications/AFDP-3-01-Counterair-Ops/
United States Air Force. 2022. “Air Force Doctrine Note 1-21, Agile Combat Employment.” Maxwell AFB, AL: Lemay Center. https://www.doctrine.af.mil/Operational-Level-Doctrine/AFDN-1-21-Agile-Combat-Employment/
United States Joint Chiefs of Staff. 2024. “Joint publication 3-01: Countering air and missile threats.” Incorporating Change 1, Washington, DC.
United States Joint Chiefs of Staff. 2019 “Joint Publication 3-30: Joint Air Operations.” Washington, DC. https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/jp3_30.pdf
Von Stackelberg, Heinrich. 2010. Market structure and equilibrium. Springer Science & Business Media. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-12586-7
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The copyediting stage is intended to improve the flow, clarity, grammar, wording, and formatting of the article. It represents the last chance for the author to make any substantial changes to the text because the next stage is restricted to typos and formatting corrections. The file to be copyedited is in Word or .rtf format and therefore can easily be edited as a word processing document. The set of instructions displayed here proposes two approaches to copyediting. One is based on Microsoft Word's Track Changes feature and requires that the copy editor, editor, and author have access to this program. A second system, which is software independent, has been borrowed, with permission, from the Harvard Educational Review. The journal editor is in a position to modify these instructions, so suggestions can be made to improve the process for this journal.
