Improved Modeling of Maintenance for Future Vertical Lift


  • Jake Killian
  • Cameron Cuerruto
  • Christopher Hensley
  • Chloe Schretzman
  • Julian McDuffie
  • Andrew Bellocchio
  • Courtney Razon
  • Brandon Thompson



Maintenance Free Operating Period, Limited Maintenance Operating Period, Future Vertical Lift


The Future Vertical Lift (FVL) Cross Functional Team (CFT) required analysis on the sustainment performance of FVL aircraft operating in Multi-Domain Operations (MDO). A study from last year forecasted the sustainment performance of FVL’s Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft (FARA) based upon historical performance of the enduring AH-64 Apache infused with emerging technologies. This study improved last year’s model by refining key assumptions. First, a Forward Maintenance Team in MDO conducted limited maintenance that was constrained by an austere environment. Second, the assumption of constant component failure rates was updated with increasing hazard rates to reflect fatigue in mechanical systems like the transmission and rotors. Third, technological risk was captured by accounting for the uncertainty associated with infused technologies based on the Technology Readiness Level. Finally, the historical failure rates of the enduring fleet of AH-64, UH-60, and CH-47 aircraft guided reliability forecasts for FARA increments over its life cycle.


Bellocchio, A., & Dean, N., & Distefano, D., & Lesinski, E., & McHugh, M., & Oursler, O., & Pegues, K. (2021) Evaluating a Maintenance Free Operating Period for Future Vertical Lift. A Regional Conference of the Society for Industrial and Systems Engineering, ISBN: 97819384962-0-2.

Bellocchio, Andrew. (2021). Maintenance Operating Periods in Multi-Domain Operations [Presentation]. 2021 U.S.-Canada IEA 1794 Exchange.

Boller, C., & Buderath, M. (2007). Fatigue in aerostructures - Where structural health monitoring can contribute to a complex subject. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 365(1851), 561–587.

Carpenter, R., Alexander, R., Jonas, P., & Smith, J. (2020). SORE 23 Report-Analysis of Materiel Availability and Operational Availability for Future Long Range Assault Aircraft Sore 23-Emerging Technologies to Augment Army Aviation Multi-Domain Operations.

Carpenter, Robert. (2020). Analysis of Materiel Availability and Operational Availability for Future Long Range Assault Aircraft. FirePoint Innovations Center, Whichita, Kansas, 2020, 1–460.

Department of the Army. (2007). Attack Reconnaissance Helicopter Operations (FM 3-04.126).

Department of Defense. (2010). Technology Readiness Levels in the Department of Defense (DoD). In Defense Acquisition Guidebook. DoD.

Farrington, Seth and The RAM Team. (2022). AH64, UH60, CH47 Maintenance ASAP Data. [Data Sets]. U.S. Army Futures Command, DEVCOM, SYSTEM READINESS DIRECTORATE, FCDD-AME-MR, REDSTONE ARSENAL, AL 35898-5000.

Jardine, Andrew and Tsang, Albert. (2013). Maintenance, Replacement, and Reliability: Theory and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

Kirby, M. R. (2001). A Methodology for Technology Identification, Evaluation, and Selection in Conceptual and Prelimary Aircraft Design [Georgia Institute of Technology].

O’Connor, Patrick and Kleyner, Andre. (2012). Practical Reliability Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., West Sussex, UK.

Wang, K.S., Hsu, F.S., and Liu, P.P. (2002). Modeling the bathtub shape hazard rate function in terms of reliability. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 75(3), 397-406. ISSN 0951-8320,



How to Cite

Killian, J., Cuerruto, C., Hensley, C., Schretzman, C., McDuffie, J., Bellocchio, A., Razon, C., & Thompson, B. (2022). Improved Modeling of Maintenance for Future Vertical Lift. Industrial and Systems Engineering Review, 10(2), 109-114.