Analyzing and Evaluating Alternatives for the Bradley Fighting Vehicle Powertrain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37266/ISER.2022v10i2.pp135-141Keywords:
Vehicle Design, Reliability, Powertrain AnalysisAbstract
The United States Army relies on its fleet of combat vehicles to allow for freedom to maneuver on the battlefield. In turn, these vehicles rely on their powertrains, particularly, the engine and transmission, to properly function. This study evaluates the benefits obtained from upgrading the powertrain for the family of medium-tracked vehicles, focusing on the M2A3 Bradley Fighting Vehicle. These benefits are quantified by changes in performance, reliability, and sustainability through the use of a value model. The value model provides an overall score that quantifies for the benefit of upgrading the engine. Vehicle performance is captured through a tractive-effort analysis which converts engine and transmission performance data to vehicle performance measures. Reliability is modeled through a bottom-up component analysis. The study presents a drive-cycle analysis for the M2A3 to estimate the amount of fuel consumption to provide a sustainability metric. The study found that while some improvement can be realized through changing the engine, a much larger benefit can be gained from modifying both the engine and transmission.
References
Banks, J., Hines, J., Lebold, M., Campbell, R., & Begg, C. (2001). “Failure modes and predictive diagnostics considerations for diesel engines.” Proceedings of the 55th Meeting of the Society for Machinery Failure Prevention Technology.
Feickert, A. (2016). The Army's Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV): Background and Issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service, Washington DC.
Gebicke, M.E. (1988). “Bradley Vehicle: Status of Transmission’s Reliability.” United States General Accounting Office, Document Number GAO/NSIAD-88-149FS, Washington DC, United States.
Gillespie, T. D. (1992). Fundamentals of vehicle dynamics (Vol. 114). SAE Technical Publications.
Grummitt D. “Bradley Fighting Vehicle: The US Army's Combat-Proven Fighting Platform, 1981-2021.” Bradley Fighting Vehicle. 2021:1-64.
Jennings, H. P. (2015). Built to Last: The Army's Failed Quest to Replace the Bradley Fighting Vehicle. US Army School for Advanced Military Studies, Fort Leavenworth, United States.
Raffa, C., Schwarz, E., & Tasdemir, J. (2005). Combat vehicle engine selection methodology based on vehicle integration considerations (No. 2005-01-1545). SAE Technical Paper.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The copyediting stage is intended to improve the flow, clarity, grammar, wording, and formatting of the article. It represents the last chance for the author to make any substantial changes to the text because the next stage is restricted to typos and formatting corrections. The file to be copyedited is in Word or .rtf format and therefore can easily be edited as a word processing document. The set of instructions displayed here proposes two approaches to copyediting. One is based on Microsoft Word's Track Changes feature and requires that the copy editor, editor, and author have access to this program. A second system, which is software independent, has been borrowed, with permission, from the Harvard Educational Review. The journal editor is in a position to modify these instructions, so suggestions can be made to improve the process for this journal.
