Implementation of Systems Engineering Approach in Academic Projects: Software Defined Radio Technology Development as a Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37266/ISER.2016v4i1.pp22-36Abstract
Each year, federal and private agencies spend billions of dollars on research projects that academic institutions conduct for them. However, the communication language between these agencies as clients and academia as hosts, is not very efficient and well-established. This has resulted in lack of clarity in clients’ description of what exactly to be expected and in hosts’ description of their capabilities and challenges. In addition, many of these projects are essentially interdisciplinary and demand the involvement of diverse research teams from different university departments. Lack of cohesive collaboration among these diverse teams results in mismatches between different compartments of project output, and consequently, generation of superfluous product prototypes. Finally, for their real-time tracking and later retrieval, the current situation of documentation of academic projects needs to be significantly altered. We suggest that the presence of a systems engineering team should be an indispensable part of a large academic research project, in order to monitor and manage the various aspects and phases from initiation to completion.
For this purpose, we proposed a systems engineering model specific for academic research projects, which considers both strengths and challenges of universities as host research institutes. As a case study, we applied this proposed systems engineering approach on a NASA-funded project at Morgan State University (MSU) which was about design and implementation of software defined radio (SDR) for space exploration. Application of this model significantly improved the professional dialogue and technical clarifications between NASA and MSU partners, as well as within MSU teams. Moreover, the sub-system compatibility among different modules of the implemented product was notably enhanced. Overall, application of systems engineering approach in academic projects can result in mutual benefits for the institution and either federal or private client.
References
Ave-Klutse Kodzo Paaku Kludze, J. (2003). Engineering Of Complex Systems: The Impact of Systems Engineering at NASA.
Blanchard, B. S., & Fabrycky, W. J. (n.d.). Systems Engineering and Analysis.
Buege, D. M. (2000). The Engineering Design of System: Models and Methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Inc.
Damian, D. (2007). Stakeholders in Global Requirements Engineering: Lessons Learned from Practice. IEEE.
Kasser, J., & Hitchins, D. K. (2011). Unifying systems engineering: Seven principles for systems engineered solution systems. The 20th International sympsium of the INCOSE. Denwer: INCOSE.
Larson, & Wertz, W. (1999). Space Mission Analysis and design.
Matthews, C. (2012). Federal Support for Academic Research. Congressional Research Service.
NASA. (2007). NASA System Engineering Processes and Requirements (NASA Requirement Protocol). NPR 7123.1A.
NASA. (2007). NASA Systems Engineering Handbook. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration , United States.
NASA. (2014). National Aeronautic and Space Administration. Retrieved from www. Nasa.gov.
Pohl, K. (2013). The Three Dimensions of Requirement Enineering . ESPRIT Basic Research Action 6353 Novel Approaches to Theories Underlying Requirements Engineering (NATURE).
Proakis, J. G. (1995). Digital Communications. New York: McGraw Hill, Inc.
Reinhart, R. C., & Scardelletti, M. C. (2008). Hardware Architecture Study for NASA’s Space Software Defined Radios.
Tuttlebee, W. H. (2002). Software Defined Radio: Origin, Drivers, and International Prespectives.
Vitech, C. (2013). CORE 8 Systems Engineering Guided Tour. Retrieved from Vitechcorp.com.
Vitech, C. (2014, Vitech Corporation). CORE Benefits. Retrieved from Vitechcorp.com.
Wertz, W. J., & Larson, J. R. (1999). Space Mission Analysis and design.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The copyediting stage is intended to improve the flow, clarity, grammar, wording, and formatting of the article. It represents the last chance for the author to make any substantial changes to the text because the next stage is restricted to typos and formatting corrections. The file to be copyedited is in Word or .rtf format and therefore can easily be edited as a word processing document. The set of instructions displayed here proposes two approaches to copyediting. One is based on Microsoft Word's Track Changes feature and requires that the copy editor, editor, and author have access to this program. A second system, which is software independent, has been borrowed, with permission, from the Harvard Educational Review. The journal editor is in a position to modify these instructions, so suggestions can be made to improve the process for this journal.
