Analyzing the Integration of MBSE Approaches within the Aerospace Industry according to UTAUT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37266/ISER.2022v10i2.pp127-134Keywords:
Model-Based Systems Engineering, Unified Theory of Acceptance, Use of Technology, AerospaceAbstract
As modern systems grow increasingly complex and the physical workplace becomes increasingly digitized, many industries have recognized the need to transition from traditional document-based systems engineering to Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE). Despite this recognition, several industries have failed to fully embrace MBSE, notably aerospace. To understand this hesitation, relevant research regarding MBSE adoption within the aerospace industry was mapped to the key factors and moderators of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). This mapping highlighted key challengers and enablers. Significant challengers to MBSE adoption appear to be upfront investment, uprooting of legacy methods and established norms, and reliance on an imperfect, training-intensive modeling language. Significant enablers to MBSE adoption appear to be collective organizational support, touted success in small-scale projects, and MBSE-driven studies in academia. Ultimately, conclusions drawn from this mapping present areas for future study and improvement to MBSE adoption approaches across all disciplines.
References
Alamiah, M. A. et. al. (2019). Applying the UTAUT model to explain the students’ acceptance of mobile learning in higher education. IEEE Access, 7.
Chami, M. & Bruel, J. M. (2018). A survey on MBSE adoption challenges. INCOSE EMEA Sector Systems Engineering Conference.
Chami, M. et al. (2018). Towards solving MBSE adoption challenges: the D3 MBSE adoption toolbox. INCOSE International Symposium, 28.
Chao, C. (2019). Factors Determining the Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Learning: An Application and Extension of the UTAUT Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10: 1-14.
Cloutier, R., & Bone, M. (2010). The current state of model based systems engineering: results from the OMG SysML request for information 2009. Conference on Systems Engineering Research.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 13: 319-340.
Delligatti, L. (2014). SysML distilled: A brief guide to the systems modeling language. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Friedenthal, S. et al. (2015). A practical guide to SysML: the systems modeling language. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Hallqvist, J., & Larsson, J. (2016). Introducing MBSE using systems engineering principles. INCOSE International Symposium, 26.
Hart, L. E. (2015). Lockheed Martin Corporation: Introduction to model-based systems engineering (MBSE) and SysML. Delaware Valley INCOSE Chapter.
Huldt, T., & Stenius, I. (2019). State-of-practice survey of model-based systems engineering. Systems Engineering, 22: 134-145.
INCOSE. (2007). Systems engineering vision 2020. San Diego, CA: INCOSE.
INCOSE. (2014). A world in motion: systems engineering vision 2025. San Diego, CA: INCOSE.
Kӧßler, J., & Paetzold, K. (2017). Integration of MBSE into existing development processes – expectations and challenges. International Conference on Engineering Design, 3: 51-60.
Lippert, S. K., & Forman, H. (2005). Utilization of information technology: examining cognitive and experiential factors of post-adoption behavior. IEEE Transactions of Engineering Management, 53(3): 363-381.
Madni, A. M., & Purohit, S. (2019). Economic analysis of model-based systems engineering. Systems.
Madni, A. M., & Sievers, M. (2018). Model-based systems engineering: Motivation, current status, and research opportunities. Systems Engineering, 21: 172-190.
Marchewka, J. T., & Kostiwa, K. (2007). An application of the UTAUT model for understanding student perceptions using course management software. Communications of the IIMA, 7.
Motamedian, B. (2013). MBSE applicability analysis. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 4.
Pawlikowski, G. J. et. al. (2020). Independent assessment of perception from external/non-NASA systems engineering (SE) sources. NASA Tech Fellow for SE.
Scheeren, I., & Pereira, C. E., (2014). Combining model-based systems engineering, simulation and domain engineering in the development of industrial automation systems. IEEE International Symposium on Object/Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing, 17.
Schöberl, M. et al. (2020). Evaluating MBSE potential using product and development characteristics – a statistical investigation. International Design Conference – Design 2020. 2385-2394.
Sheard, S. et al. (2015). A complexity primer for systems engineers. INCOSE Complex Systems Working Group White Paper, 1: 1–10.
Spangelo, S. C. et al. (2012). Applying Model Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) to a standard CubeSat. IEEE Aerospace Conference. 1-20.
Straub, E. T. (2017). Understanding technology adoption: theory and future direction for informal learning. Review of Education Research, 79(2): 625-649.
Venkatesh, V. et al. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: a synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information System, 17: 328-376.
Wang, L. (2016). Effort to accelerate MBSE adoption and usage at JSC. AIAA SPACE Forum.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The copyediting stage is intended to improve the flow, clarity, grammar, wording, and formatting of the article. It represents the last chance for the author to make any substantial changes to the text because the next stage is restricted to typos and formatting corrections. The file to be copyedited is in Word or .rtf format and therefore can easily be edited as a word processing document. The set of instructions displayed here proposes two approaches to copyediting. One is based on Microsoft Word's Track Changes feature and requires that the copy editor, editor, and author have access to this program. A second system, which is software independent, has been borrowed, with permission, from the Harvard Educational Review. The journal editor is in a position to modify these instructions, so suggestions can be made to improve the process for this journal.
